Who helped negotiate
America's diplomatic defeat in Vietnam and Ian Smith's defeat in Rhodesia in
1976? Henry Kissinger. Several years ago he was invited to South
Africa to negotiate differences between the Zulus and the Marxist ANC.
Donald McAlvany warns, "Watch out! When Kissinger negotiates, the
communists always win!" (McAlvany Intelligence Adviser,
April 1994, p. 14)
Henry
Kissinger
The very day after the Tiananmen
Square massacre in China, Kissinger's syndicated column referred to Deng
Xiaoping (China's leader) as "one of the great reformers in Chinese
history" and a man "who chose a more humane and less
chaotic course" [1] for China. Though he later expressed
shock at the "brutality" of the crackdown, the general trend of
his statements have been to find excuses for the Chinese authorities.
According to Bill Gertz, "Kissinger played the
key role in secret talks during the 1970s that led President Nixon to
establish informal ties with China in 1972 and ultimately led to formal
diplomatic relations in 1979..." (The China Threat, Bill Gertz,
p. 44)
In a single year, Kissinger may go to China several
times, and the door is always open to him. In September 1990, Kissinger met
with Li Peng, the man considered to be most directly responsible for
ordering the Tiananmen massacre, who gave Kissinger and his wife a banquet
complete with warm mutual toasts. The next day, Kissinger when to see Jiang
Zemin, who noted that Kissinger was making his eighteenth visit to the
People's Republic of China.
Kissinger's views of China, incidentally, are
almost identical to the view put force in public statements by communist
Chinese leaders themselves.
Many American corporations seeking to do business
with China pay Kissinger large sums of money at least in part because of his
unparalleled access to China's most powerful figures. As Senator Scott
Thompson stated before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, "The
fact is that [Kissinger] does receive substantial remuneration from
corporations with major investments in China, which stood to benefit from
adoption of his positions." (U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Hearings
on U.S. Policy Toward China, February 13, 1990)
On September 12, 1989, John J. Fialka of the Wall
Street Journal accused Kissinger that his business dealings with China
represented a conflict of interest with the United States. From this and
other criticism, Kissinger became defensive and called any linking of his
views on China with his business interests a form of
"McCarthyism." Actually, some Americans were beginning to see dark
shades of a traitor in Kissinger.
Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily accuses
Kissinger of being well-paid by the Chinese for his public relations
services:
I'll tell
you who I think should be in jail for selling out American security
interests in favor of their own pocketbooks--Henry
[Kissinger] the K and Al Haig. At the very least, they should be
required to register as paid foreign lobbyists and identified as such each
and every time they appear on television and radio as sober and
dispassionate commentators on the world scene. (The
'establishment' knows best, April 7, 1999 by Joseph Farah)
It is interesting to
note that Kissinger's one-time Jewish aide, Morton Halperin, is seriously
considered by many people to be a communist agent:
Halperin, according to a well-respected
former State official, was suspected of working for the communists in the
'60s and '70s. "He was a person we knew to be pro-Soviet and not a
person to be trusted," said the official, who worked in intelligence
during the height of the Cold War.
"Halperin has been known on embassy
(briefing) cards as a Soviet or communist agent," added the official,
who was an expert on the Soviet Union, in an exclusive interview with
WorldNetDaily.
A Democrat-controlled Senate denied Halperin
confirmation as President Clinton's nominee as assistant secretary of
defense in large part because of his radical leftist views. His current
post did not require confirmation. Books have linked Halperin to the
KGB....
From 1975 to 1992, he headed the Center for
National Security Studies in Washington. CNSS is a spinoff of the
Institute for Policy Studies, a pro-Marxist think tank that has supported
Soviet and Cuban operations in Third World countries. (To
Russia with love? Friday, May 19, 2000 by Paul Sperry)
Unknown to
most people, and really only known through Our Lady of the Roses message,
the worldwide Warning would have occurred on December 28, 1973, followed by
the great War. But a reprieve was granted to the world, because of mankind's
prayerful response. In other words, the Yom Kippur War would have evolved
into World War III, were it not for the mercy of God. This is easy to
imagine when we realize how close the Yom Kippur War came to nuclear war:
In 1973, Syria launched
the latest of a series of full-scale wars on Israel -- a sneak attack on
the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur. Most analysts agree that had Syria held
that high ground prior to the invasion, there would have been no stopping
the onslaught. As it was, the Israelis very nearly lost the war. Defeat
was so close that Defense Minister Moshe Dayan and Prime Minister Golda
Meir armed the "doomsday weapon"
-- Israel's limited strategic
nuclear arsenal. (The
Mideast 'peace' talks, January 6, 2000 by Joseph Farah)
The Yom Kippur
War
It is very interesting that Our Lady of the Roses provided this
vision of Kissinger and the Russians planning a war in May 1973, when the
Yom Kippur War was still four months into the future, to begin on October 6,
1973.
Following
a cease-fire, the Yom Kippur War officially ended on October 22, 1973 but
fighting continued on the Egyptian-Israeli front and the U.S. and the Soviet
Union were nearly dragged into a full-scale superpower confrontation.
Various articles illustrate just how close the world came to a major
catastrophe:
As Israel, a U.S. ally,
met Syria and Egypt, Soviet client states, on the battlefield,
policymakers in Washington and Moscow jockeyed for position. For a few
hours, Washington and Moscow both weighed the possibility of a direct
confrontation between the superpowers. The United States put its forces on
nuclear alert after the Soviet Union threatened to dispatch troops to
defend Egypt. (Yom
Kippur War changed US-Israel ties, Matthew Dorf)
The
initial days of the war were disastrous for Israel: it lost over 150
planes and its counter-attacks failed. But then Israel reversed its
losses, repelling the Syrians back into Syria itself, reaching within 12
miles of Damascus.
Seeing
the invasion faltering, the Soviet Union sent massive shipments of
supplies to assist Syria and Egypt and in response, the U.S. did the same
for Israel.
Meanwhile,
Israeli forces led by Ariel Sharon beat back the Egyptian advance in the
south, crossed the canal and surrounded the Egyptian Third Army. With
Israel poised to wipe out Egypt's troops or storm Damascus, U.S. Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger went to Moscow to negotiate a cease-fire
agreement.
The
agreement reached in Moscow called for cessation of hostilities within 24
hours. But soon the USSR claimed Israel was breaking its terms by planning
to move against the trapped Egyptian troops. Only when the Soviet Union
threatened to intervene, and the U.S. pressed Israel to back off, did the
cease fire take effect on Oct. 25. (CBS.com--The
Yom Kippur War)
Naturally, the war involved global as well
as regional politics. The USSR had actively supported the Arab cause and
on the third day of fighting (9 October) it called upon various Afro-Arab
states to fully support Egypt and Syria. Also at that time, the USSR
instituted a massive air operation to re-supply Egypt and Syria with
military equipment. Soviet naval maneuvers and public statements of Soviet
officials helped to develop an impression that the USSR might intervene
even more actively. After several days of fighting, with Israel becoming
increasingly dominant, US Secretary of State Kissinger visited Moscow
on 20 October to discuss the conflict in response to an urgent request
from Soviet First Secretary Brezhnev. Following these discussions, the
superpowers cooperated in convoking a meeting of the UN Security Council,
which passed their joint resolution calling for a cease-fire, negotiations
among the parties, and implementation of Resolution 242 (see Case269:
Arab-Israeli Confrontation, 1967-1973). The superpowers pressured their
client states to accept the resolution's provisions.
Although
formally accepting the cease-fire, Israel continued to improve its
military position on the west bank of the Canal, effectively isolating the
Egyptian forces on the east bank. For unclear motives, the USSR
engaged in a series of military and diplomatic actions that US President
Nixon's administration saw as being quite provocative; refusing a
Soviet plan for the superpowers to police a truce in the Middle East with
their own force and concerned that the USSR would unilaterally intervene
with strong military forces, on 25 October the US placed its forces on
world-wide military alert. A new Soviet-American agreement was quickly
reached; The Security Council reaffirmed its call for a cease-fire and
recreated the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF: seeCase119: Suez War,
1956-1957) to supervise it. Furthermore, the five permanent Council
members were prohibited from participating in a peacekeeping force in the
area. The US military alert was then gradually lifted. On the same day,
the USSR told the US that it would act to relieve the surrounded Egyptian
force with Soviet forces unless Israel permitted Egyptian supplies to be
provided; the US thereupon pressured Israel to return to the 22 October
lines, but this pressure was resisted. A visit by Kissinger to Egypt,
however, broke the impasse, and on 11 November Israeli and Egyptian
military commanders signed an agreement for negotiating a withdrawal to
their earlier positions and for the relief of the isolated Egyptian
troops. (Dis73a03
Yom Kippur War, USC University)
On 13 October the watchful Israeli
commanders finally observed large-scale movement in the congested Egyptian
bridgehead, as the powerful armored divisions, the 21st in the 2nd Army
and the 4th in the 3rd Army sectors, crossed from the west bank into
jump-off positions for an attack. Bracing themselves for the armored
onslaught, the Israeli tankers took up defensive positions on
the high
ground, facing the approaches from which they anticipated the Egyptian
attack.
Facing the Israelis were some 1200 modern Soviet tanks
massed in attack formation interspersed with infantry on APCs and trucks
carrying anti-tank missiles and heavy concentrations of artillery. Though
cautious, the Egyptians were confident. And from their recent experiences
with the Israeli forces they had no reason not to be.
It should
be mentioned that the Israeli troops that managed to sneak around and get
into the Egyptian city of Suez on the western bank of the canal was
completely surrounded by Egyptian heavy artillery and tanks and completely
paralyzed. Later, the United States and the United Soviet Socialist
Republics convinced the Egyptian leader Anwar Elsadat that demolishing
that part of the Israeli army would start a third world war, thus,
the Egyptians allowed the Israeli infiltrating troops to retreat towards
the Sinai peninsula. (Kamal Hasan Ali, The Roads of Life -- El-Shorouk
Publishing house, Cairo, 1994. Article by Mohammad
Tawfik, October 2, 2000)
The
tide of the war began to turn on October 10. The Syrians were pushed
back and Israel advanced into Syria proper. The Soviet Union responded
by sending airlifts to Damascus and Cairo, which were answered on October 12
and 13 by massive US airlifts to Israel. Israeli forces crossed the
Suez Canal and surrounded the Egyptian Third Army on October 21.
The war
started an international crisis when the Soviet Union responded to a plea
from Egypt to save its Third Army by threatening to send troops to assist
Egypt. Henry Kissinger, the US Secretary of State, went to Moscow
to negotiate a cease-fire. The result was UN Resolution 338, an
immediate cease-fire that reinstated Resolution 242, which "aimed at
establishing a just and durable peace in the Middle East". This
cease-fire was broken and again the Soviets threatened to intervene.
However, the US pressured Israel into accepting a second cease-fire on
October 25, 1973. The war was over, and both Israel and Egypt claimed
victory. (The Yom Kippur War, North Park University)
References:
[1] Henry A. Kissinger, "For China,
Economic Reforms Spark Eruptions," [Los Angeles] Times, July 30,
1989.
Directives
from Heaven:
#10 - Consecrate Russia
#57 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part I)
#58 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part II)
#59 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part III)
#101 - Russia and China, Part 1
#102 - Russia and China, Part 2
#103 - Communism
#104 - Invasion
Bayside
Prophecies:
June 18, 1992 -- Communism death;
a ruse. (click
here)
October 2, 1987
- Consecrate Russia, or else... (click
here) April 14, 1984 -- Do not take lightly the
reports of ships out on the sea and submarines... (click
here)
June 18, 1984 -- You are surrounded now by reconnaissance
planes and also by missiles (click
here)
March 26, 1983 -- Russia plans to invade the United
States with missiles (click
here)
May 28, 1983 - The Third World War... (click
here)
November 20, 1978 --
...Pray for your new Pope. He must be given the strength
even unto the point of martyrdom if necessary. He must not allow Communism
to control Rome. (click
here)
External Links:
The
'establishment' knows best April 7, 1999 by Joseph Farah
To
Russia with love? May 19, 2000 by Paul Sperry
The
Perestroika Deception
Ex-spy
Fears Sneak Russian Attack (NewsMax.com, January 25, 2000)
Russia and
China: An Anti-American Alliance (NewsMax.com, July 19, 2000)
Russia Arming
Chinese Navy Against U.S. (NewsMax.com, July 12, 2000)
Surprise
Nuclear Attack, Part 1, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily)
Surprise
Nuclear Attack, Part 2, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily)
Russia's
Economic Moves and What They Portend, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily)
A
Genuine Threat of War? J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily)
Russian
Threats: Then and Now - Introduction (WorldNetDaily)
Can
Moscow Be Trusted? Russia's Hidden Nuclear Missiles - Part I (WorldNetDaily)
Can
Moscow Be Trusted? Inside Russia's Magic Mountain - Part II (WorldNetDaily)
High
Anxiety, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily)
Ex-spy
Fears Sneak Russian Attack. Newsmax.com, January 25, 2000
China
Reveals Nuclear War Plans Against U.S. (UPI, March 20, 2000)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 1 (Christopher Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 2: Clinton's Sell-Out of America: (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 3: Russia and China -- Our Friends? (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 4: Russia May Launch a Surprise
Attack Against US (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 5: Russia’s Recent Military Build-up (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 6: Eleven Signs of a Russian Surprise
Attack (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 7: United States is Unprepared for War (Christopher
Ruddy)
Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 8: Why are Most Americans Oblivious to
These Terrifying Facts? (Christopher
Ruddy)
My gift to help spread Our Lady of the Roses' messages to the world.
| Home - Latest News |
Introduction |
Bayside Prophecies | Directives from
Heaven | Order Form |
Miracles & Cures |
Veronica Lueken |
Miraculous Photos |
Bible |
Radio Program |
Bayside Videos |
We encourage
everyone to print or email copies of this web page to all the Bishops and all
the clergy. Also, email or send this web page to the news media and as many
people as possible.
The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.
Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a
hyperlink to:
https://www.tldm.org
Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2020 All rights
reserved.
P.O. Box 40
616-698-6448
Lowell, MI 49331-0040
Revised: July 25, 2022
|