|
THIS
SACRAMENT OF LOVE
In year 700 a priest in Lanciano, Italy doubted the Real Presence of
Jesus in the Eucharist. One day
at his Mass at the words of consecration the Host turned into Flesh and the
wine turned into Blood. Millions
of people from then until now, come from all over the world come to see this
Miraculous Host and Blood.
In 1970, the Vatican ordered a
thorough investigation with the latest scientific medical equipment and the
most illustrious professors in the medical field.
The investigation showed the Host
had turned into living flesh, into a very fine slice through the center of a
human heart, as though it had just been expertly cut by a surgeon’s
scalpel. It tested as living
Heart tissue and living Blood even though this miracle happened 1270 years
ago.
Jesus truly gives His Love, His
Body, His Most Sacred Heart to us in Holy Communion.
HAVE
YOU EVER ASKED JESUS?
Father Aloysius Ellacuria, the founder of the Missionaries of Perpetual
Adoration, had a young mother come to him in the early 1970’s, her eyes
filled with tears, an aching body filled with cancer, and little time to
live.
He took her into the chapel asking her, “Have you ever asked Jesus
to cure you?” “No,” she
replied. “Well,” he said,
“Let us kneel down right here in front of the Most Blessed Sacrament, and
let us ask Our Lord to cure you.”
“You know Jesus is really
present in the Most Blessed Sacrament; do you really believe that?”
“Yes,” she promptly replied.
Father continued, “Our Lord is the same as He Who walked on this
earth 2000 years ago; and He blessed the sick and healed the sick.
Do you really believe that He is the same Lord Who is living here in
the Most Blessed Sacrament?” “Yes,
I do,” was her pain-filled response.
“Well, He cured them and He can cure you.”
Together they prayed a series of
“Our Fathers, Hail Mary’s and Glory Be’s.”
After three of each the startled woman said: “Father, I don’t think it is
necessary for us to go on – I feel healed!”
The next day X-rays were taken by an astonished doctor who said:
“All the cells that were attacked by the cancer are now like the cells of
a new-born baby.”
O
Sacrament Most Holy, O Sacrament Divine,
all praise and all thanksgiving be
every moment Thine!
BEGUN
IN DISOBEDIENCE
The
practice of Communion in the hand was first introduced in Belgium by
Cardinal Suenens in disobedience to the rubrics of the Holy See. Not wishing
to publicly rebuke a brother bishop, Pope Paul VI decided to lift the ban
prohibiting Communion in the hand, leaving the decision to individual
bishops. The late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, then president of the United
States NCCB, initiated two unsuccessful attempts to introduce Communion in
the hand in 1975 and 1976. In the spring of 1977, the bishops’ vote again
fell short of the required two-thirds majority. Nevertheless, for the first
time ever bishops in absentia were polled by mail after the conference
meeting; subsequently the necessary votes materialized and the measure was
declared passed. Several canon lawyers have stated categorically that this
procedure was illegal. An interview with Bishop Blanchette in the National
Catholic Register (June 12, 1977) confirms that Communion in the hand
was unlawfully introduced into the United States. Fr. John Hardon likewise
has affirmed the fact that retired and dying bishops were polled to make
sure the measure for Communion in the hand would be passed.
REAL
WORLD, REAL ABUSES
The
greater a person’s charity is, the more he is compelled to speak what he
knows to be true. If someone truly loves his neighbor, it is painful for him
to see him deprived of truth. And so it is with our heavenly Mother, the
Blessed Virgin Mary. Her love for us exceeds all mortals and even our own
parents, for Her love is supernatural and without equal, save that of God
Himself. Therefore, She would have Her children “walking in truth” (3
John 4), in the path of the Church and the Commandments, and Our Lady will
not fail to warn Her children when their means of salvation, the Catholic
faith, is under attack. Right now, the summit of our Catholic faith, Our
Lord Jesus Christ present in the Sacrament of Love, the Holy Eucharist, is
under daily attack. The indult of Communion in the hand has opened a major
door to numerous acts of irreverence and sacrilege. Years ago, when
Communion in the hand was beginning to rear its ugly head in the United
States, a group of concerned Catholics ran a full-page ad in the Hartford
[Connecticut] Courant newspaper (April 27, 1977, p. 16) to express their
dismay concerning acts of sacrilege reported in Europe from Communion in the
hand. Within this full-page ad were horrendous testimonies of sacrilege
against the blessed Sacrament. The following testimonies were collected by
an editor in Zurich, Switzerland:
“In
a restaurant, some young people cut a Host into pieces to see if the Blood
would run, then they threw it into the toilets.” (November 1969,
Witness: proprietor).
“In
a dry-cleaning establishment, we found the Consecrated Host in a boy’s
trousers. The boy admitted receiving it in a round-about fashion, thanks
to distribution of Communion in the hands…” (January 10/70, Witness:
proprietor).
“A
woman who attended daily Mass twice a day in two different churches
observed a man who also attended Mass in these two different churches and
who received Communion each time. (Two Communions daily)… The woman
denounced this act to the Vicar General whom she knew well. They found
this man’s address and apprehended him one day as he was leaving his
residence. The package that he was carrying was opened; it contained
seventeen Hosts!!! Upon being questioned, he named those who had given him
this work and said he was given francs for each host.” (Witness: a
Dominican priest, L.P.A.N.).
“In
Holland, some students were conducting a flourishing trade in consecrated
Hosts, thanks to Communion given in the hand. They collected them and
arranged them on the wall, like butterflies. About 200 Hosts were found,
transpierced in this manner…” (Witness: President of the parish,
F.E.A.G.). 
HISTORICAL
CHURCH PRACTICE
Reviewing available evidence from
Church history and the writings of the Church Fathers does not support the
claim that Communion in the hand was a universal practice that was gradually
supplanted and eventually replaced by the practice of Communion on the
tongue. Rather, the facts seem to point to a different conclusion.
Pope St. Leo the Great (440-461),
already in the fifth century, is an early witness of the traditional
practice. In his comments on the sixth chapter of the Gospel of John, he
speaks of Communion in the mouth as the current usage: "One receives in
the mouth what one believes by faith." (Serm. 91.3) Furthermore,
in the ninth century the Roman Ordo clearly shows that Communion on
the tongue was the manner of reception. The oft-quoted reference of St.
Cyril of Jerusalem is quite suspect, because what follows his famous quote
is odd, superstitious, and even irreverent to Catholic thought. This has led
scholars to question the authenticity of the text, that perhaps the saint's
successor was really responsible for this odd statement, the Patriarch John,
who succeeded St. Cyril. But this John was of suspect orthodoxy, which we
know from the correspondence of St. Epiphanius, St. Jerome, and St.
Augustine. So if the quote is genuine, it most likely is attributed to the
Nestorian Patriarch John, which would explain the oddity of the text. The
fact that St. Cyril is quoted to the exclusion of Pope St. Leo the Great,
Pope St. Sixtus I, the Council of Trent, and centuries of Church tradition,
is a prime example of the historical revisionism and dumbing-down of the
modernists. Just a sampling of reliable historical evidence is enough
to demonstrate the consistent position of the Church regarding Communion in
the hand:
Pope
St. Sixtus I ( 115-125): "it is
prohibited for the faithful to even touch the sacred vessels, or receive in
the hand";
Origen
(185-232 A.D.): "You who are wont to assist at the divine Mysteries,
know how, when you receive the body of the Lord, you take reverent care,
lest any particle of it should fall to the ground and a portion of the
consecrated gift (consecrati muneris) escape you. You consider it a
crime, and rightly so, if any particle thereof fell down through
negligence." (13th Homily on Exodus);
St.
Basil the Great (330-379), one of the
four great Eastern Fathers, considered Communion in the hand so irregular
that he did not hesitate to consider it a grave fault (Letter 93);
The
Council held at Saragozza (380), it
was decided to punish with excommunication anyone who dared to
continue the practice of Communion in the hand;
The
local council at Rouen, France (650)
stated, “Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywomen
but only in their mouths”;
The
Council of Constantinople (692) which
was known as in trullo (not one of the ecumenical councils held
there) prohibited the faithful from giving Communion to themselves. It
decreed an excommunication of one week’s duration for those who
would do so in the presence of a bishop, priest or deacon;
Council
of Trent: "To omit nothing
doctrinal on so important a subject, we now come to speak of the minister of
the Sacrament, a point, however, on which scarcely anyone is ignorant. The
pastor then will teach, that to priests alone has been given power to
consecrate and administer the Holy Eucharist. That the unvarying practice
of the Church has also been, that the faithful receive the Sacrament
from the hand of the priest, and that the priest communicate himself, has
been explained by the Council of Trent; and the same holy Council has shown
that this practice is always to be scrupulously adhered to, stamped, as it
is, with the authoritative impress of Apostolic tradition, and sanctioned by
the illustrious example of our Lord himself, who, with His own hands,
consecrated and gave to His disciples, His most sacred body. To consult as
much as possible, for the dignity of this so August a Sacrament, not only is
its administration confided exclusively to the priestly order; but the
Church has also, by an express law, prohibited any but those who are
consecrated to religion, unless in case of necessity, to touch the sacred
vessels, the linen or other immediate necessaries for consecration. Priest
and people may hence learn, what piety and holiness they should possess who
consecrate, administer, or receive the Holy of Holies." (Council of
Trent, Session 13, Chapter 8)
"This debasement to My Son's Body shall not go unpunished!”
(Our Lady of the Roses, August 21, 1975)
OUR
LADY COMES TO US
Heaven has given us so many wonderful graces through the message of Our
Lady of the Roses. We have been blessed with much practical guidance so
desperately needed in our confused and troubled times. Particularly
important is Heaven’s directions concerning the abusive and sacrilegious
practice of Communion in the hand. Our Lady has said: "You must not
take the Body of My Son in your hand! You open the door for the entrance of
evil spirits to defile My Son's Body! The consecrated fingers of a
duly-ordained man of God, the priest, shall place My Son into your mouth,
and you must absorb His Body with goodness and love." (March 22, 1975)
Also, Our Lady said in 1984, "My Son is not pleased with the manner in
which His Body and Blood is being given to all of the humans upon earth.
Communion in the hand has not been, and will not be accepted by Heaven. This
is a sacrilege in the eyes of the Eternal Father, and must not be continued,
for you only add to your punishment when you continue on in the ways that
have been found to be unpleasing to the Eternal Father."
(Our Lady, June 30, 1984)
THE
SAINTS
So much of the sense of the sacred has
disappeared today, and so much of the heritage of Catholic teaching has been
obscured and overlooked. We now look to the writings of several saints,
which convey an admirably reverential attitude towards the sacraments,
especially the holy Eucharist. From the writings of St. Bonaventure’s The
Breviloquium, chapter 11, #5, he writes concerning the reverence for
the holy oils: "...a sacrament whose matter is holy—that is,
consecrated oil—in order to avoid any risk, its dispensation is entrusted
to priests in general. And because of the consecration of the oil, it
should be touched by none except consecrated hands." (Note the
great reverence for the sacraments in general expressed by St. Bonaventure.
The same reverence was naturally present during this time for the blessed
Sacrament, the greatest of sacraments). Another Franciscan saint, St. James
of the March, writes: "He is no less guilty who hears the word of God
carelessly than he who allows the body of Christ to fall on the ground
through his own negligence." (Office of Reading, Franciscan
Supplement, from the sermons of St. James). And of course we cannot
forget to include one of the greatest minds the Church has ever known, St.
Thomas Aquinas: "Secondly, because the priest is the appointed
intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer
the people's gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated
gifts to the people. Thirdly, because out of reverence towards this
sacrament [the Blessed Sacrament], nothing touches it but what is
consecrated, hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and
likewise the priest's hands, for touching this sacrament. Hence it is not
lawful for anyone to touch it, except from necessity, for instance if it
were to fall upon the ground, or else in some other case of urgency." (SummaTheologica,
Volume III, Q. 82, Art. 13).
PROTESTANT
INFLUENCES
This misguided enthusiasm for the
revival of Communion in the hand has been shared in the past, but notably by
those outside the Church. The Protestant revolutionary Martin Bucer
was, after Martin Luther and Melanchthon, the most influential of German
Reformers. Detesting the reverent and traditional Catholic practice of
receiving Holy Communion on the tongue, Bucer had this to say:
"Every superstition of the
Roman Antichrist is to be detested... I have no doubt that this usage of
not putting these sacraments in the hands of the faithful has been
introduced out of a double superstition; firstly, the false honor they
wished to show this sacrament, and secondly the wicked arrogance of
priests claiming greater holiness than that of the people of Christ, by
virtue of the oil of consecration. I should wish that pastors and teachers
of the people should be commanded that each is faithfully to teach the
people that it is superstitious and wicked to think...that the hands of
the ministers are holier than the hands of the laity; so that it would be
wicked, or less fitting, as was formerly wrongly believed by the ordinary
folk, for the laity to receive these sacraments in the hand: and therefore
that the indications of this wicked belief be removed-as that the
ministers may handle the sacraments, but not allow the laity to do so, and
instead put the sacraments into the mouth—which
is not only foreign to what was instituted by the Lord but offensive to
human reason. In that way good men will be easily brought to the point
of all receiving the sacred symbols in the hand..."
RECENT
TIMES
Certainly the concern for the sacred Particles of the blessed
Sacrament has been echoed by recent Popes and others within our own
lifetimes. Pope Paul VI in his instruction Memoriale
Domini (May 29, 1969), states: "It [Communion in
the hand] carries certain dangers with it which may arise from the new
manner of administering holy Communion: the danger of a loss of reverence
for the August sacrament of the altar, of profanation, of adulterating the
true doctrine." Our present Holy Father, John Paul II, some years
back had a sign posted on St. Peter's Basilica specifying that all
priests, no matter where they came from, who celebrated Mass in St. Peter's,
were to give Communion only on the tongue. When the wife of the
President of France Madame Giscard d’Estaing came before the Holy Father
with outstretched hands, he placed the Host in her mouth.
Likewise, a canon lawyer present at a papal Mass in Chicago witnessed
the mayor of Chicago approach the Holy Father also with outstretched hands.
The Holy Father said, “the Pope doesn’t do that,” and proceeded to
give her holy Communion on the tongue. Currently, John Paul II gives
Communion only on the tongue in his private Masses at the Vatican.
Concelebrating priests are told to do the same.
As
reported by Fr. George Rutler in his Good Friday sermon at St. Agnes
Church, New York in 1989, when Mother Teresa of Calcutta was asked by
Fr. Rutler, "What do you think is the worst problem in the world
today?" She more than anyone could name any number of candidates:
famine, plague, disease, the breakdown of the family, rebellion against God,
the corruption of the media, world debt, nuclear threat and so on.
"Without pausing a second she said, 'Wherever I go in the whole
world, the thing that makes me the saddest is watching people receive
Communion in the hand.'"
(note: Fr. Emerson of
the Fraternity of St. Peter was also a witness to this statement by Mother
Teresa).
Also,
the great Fr. John Hardon has spoken out against this practice. On
November 1st, 1997 at the Call to Holiness Conference in Detroit,
Michigan, there was a panel discussion in which Fr. John Hardon was one of
the speakers who fielded various questions from the audience. One of the
questions was about Communion in the hand. After explaining how the practice
was illegally introduced into the United States, he concluded by saying, “Whatever
you can do to stop Communion in the hand will be blessed by God.”
SACRILEGE
- LOSS OF FAITH
Pope Paul VI in Mysterium Fidei
quotes Origen with approval who says that if anyone dropped a Sacred
Particle of the Host on the ground (through negligence) then that person
would be guilty of sin: “In fact the faithful thought themselves guilty,
and rightly so, as Origen recalls, if after they received the Body of the
Lord in order to preserve it with all care and reverence, a small fragment
of it fell off through negligence.” (Mysterium Fidei, Pope Paul VI,
taken from "In Exod. Fragm." P.G. 12, 391.) At any given Mass
there will be at least a few, if not many, who will drop the sacred
Particles to the ground, thereby committing sacrilege and irreverence,
though it may be only through negligence and thoughtlessness. The priest,
however, is responsible to make sure that no irreverence is committed and is
bound to take all necessary precautions to safeguard the honor and respect
due Our Lord in the blessed Sacrament.
The late Fr.
Alfred Kunz, a canon lawyer, had some very powerful statements regarding
Communion in the hand: he maintained that by pastoral experience (his
pastoral experience) he was morally certain that there would be loss of
particles by placing Communion in the hands at any given Mass. This loss of
particles is an act of irreverence by the priest and he is bound not to do
anything that would violate his conscience. This irreverence to God by
losing particles is against the Divine Positive Law and therefore,
regardless of its canonical status, cannot be done.
And this is due to that fact that to drop a consecrated fragment of
the Host to the ground is the same as dropping the consecrated Host to the
ground. Even if done through negligence it is still a sin of sacrilege. The
danger of irreverence is to be avoided by Divine Law. Not even the Pope can
change this law. The Vatican document [“En
reponse a la demande,” 29 May 1969: AAS 61 (1969) 546-47 (French)]
outlining the seven conditions "sine qua non", without which
you cannot, is merely reminding us of this Divine Law. It is the
personal responsibility of the minister of the Sacrament to see to it that
all danger of irreverence towards the Blessed Sacrament be avoided.
And for this reason there are priests who have decided in conscience that
they cannot give Communion in the hand, because they are convinced that the
danger of irreverence, sacrilege and loss of true faith is too great.
Dietrich
von Hildebrand (who Pope Pius XII called a “20th century
doctor of the Church”), in an article entitled "Communion in the
hand should be rejected," wrote the following:
"Is it believable that instead of
applying the most scrupulous care to protect the most sacred consecrated
host, which is truly the Body of Christ, the God-man, from all such possible
abuses, there are those who wish to expose it to this possibility? Have we
forgotten the existence of the devil who wanders about seeking whom he may
devour'? Is his work in the world and in the Church not all too visible
today? What entitles us to assume that abuses to the consecrated host will
not take place?" Confirming
his concerns is Mike Warnke, a former satanic high priest who
converted to Christianity, who warned the U.S. bishops that allowing
Communion in the hand was a mistake, as it would allow satanists easier
access in procuring the sacred host, which is desecrated at satanic
services. The Holy Father is well aware of the danger of the loss of sacred
Particles and this is certainly part of his reasoning in not giving
Communion in the hand at his private Masses at the Vatican.
The bishops of the Philippines
have reportedly rescinded this practice, and now only permit Communion on
the tongue. Likewise, the Archbishop of San Luis, Argentina, his Excellency
Juan Rodolfo Laise, has prohibited Communion in the hand in his diocese.
Catastrophic
loss of faith
Another evil fruit of Communion in the hand has been a catastrophic
loss of faith in the Real Presence. A Gallop poll several years ago among
Catholics showed that only 30% held the true Catholic teaching concerning
the Eucharist. The other 70% represented various shades of Protestant
belief, or no belief at all. As a matter of fact, there are catechists who
can attest that some of today’s Catholic youth did not believe the Host to
be the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ until after
they began receiving on the tongue. The new practice did not convey to them
the great truth of the Real Presence. Again,
Fr. John Hardon has affirmed this:
“Behind
Communion in the hand—I wish to repeat and make as plain as I can—is a
weakening, a conscious, deliberate weakening of faith in the Real
Presence.”
GOD’S
LAW
There are those who will object that confronting this widespread
abuse of Communion in the hand is disloyal to the Church. Nothing could be
farther from the truth. It is not disloyal to say that in practice the
majority of Catholics are in disobedience to the existing law of the Church
regarding reverence towards the Blessed Sacrament and the prevention of
potential sacrilege. It is the law of the Latin Rite that we receive
in the traditional manner, i.e., Communion on the tongue. Communion in the
hand is the exception, that cannot be done if (1) there is potential
loss of particles; (2) it is instituted in exclusion of the traditional
manner of reception; or (3) there is the danger of scandal and loss of true
faith in the Blessed Sacrament as a result. So it is disingenuous to
complain that such a discussion is disloyal. This article is meant to foster
thoughtful, prayerful reflection, and to illustrate the contradiction
between Church law and common practice. The dangers that arise with
Communion in the hand are real, serious, and avoidable. What
is it called when sacred Particles of the Host fall to the ground or are
lost through negligence? It is
called a sacrilege.
Freedom not grounded in truth is a loose canon. Likewise, when words
are no longer measured by the truth of reality, they become instruments of
deception. The faithful have been deluded by propaganda regarding Communion
in the hand, and the appeal to “obedience”
(an “obedience” that is really divorced from the law of the
Church) has been used to railroad the faithful into accepting the modernist
agenda in many instances. For example, the fact that Communion in the hand
cannot be allowed if there is loss of Particles is certainly not known by
the majority of Catholics, but this in fact is the true obedience
required: that the higher law against irreverence and sacrilege be
maintained and promoted. This has frequently not been done.
If you do not have an
understanding that there is a hierarchy to law (that some laws exist to
promote and support higher, unchangeable laws of God), you will have priests
and laity alike telling you that Communion in the hand is permitted and
that’s the end of the story. But this is naïve and intellectually
dishonest, because within the indult itself there are provisions to protect
from sacrilege, scandal and loss of faith, which represents the higher law.
If any of these provisions are broken, you do not have permission to
give Communion in the hand. This is the truth, and if anyone will not submit
to these provisions, it is they who are disobedient. The
indult must serve to promote the higher law and if it does not, or a
particular spin is put on the indult that makes it in practice opposing the
higher law, then it is no longer a law, but a usurpation of a higher law.
The indult for Communion in the hand is an ecclesiastical law that can be
revoked, and was revoked in the past when it was determined to
be failing to promote the higher law of reverence. Any true and correct
interpretation of the indult must conform to and promote this higher law.
Natural law will never change (reverence belongs to this category);
ecclesiastical law can change, and the indult for Communion in the hand
belongs to this category. A soul-searching question for many priests would
be: If it was objectively determined that there was loss of sacred
Particles, scandal, or loss of faith, what would the priest be obliged to
do?
Our Lady of the Roses words
concerning the Communion in the hand issue displays a perfect and profound
grasp of the mind of the Church and the pre-eminence of natural law over
ecclesiastical law. Her words display an affirmation of the hierarchy of law
and the necessity of the clergy to submit to the immutable law of God. She
displays a complete absence of human respect, but an unqualified respect for
the divine. All this we would expect from a message attributed to Our Lady,
the Immaculate. But we must do our share and proclaim the message of Our
Lady boldly and fearlessly. As our Holy Father John Paul II has said:
“What is needed is the courage to speak the truth clearly, candidly, and
boldly, but never with hatred or disrespect for persons. We must be firmly
convinced that the truth sets people free (John 8:32).”
We must save Our Lord’s Sacred Heart from abuse and defilement
from those who do not truly believe the consecrated Host to be the body,
blood, soul and divinity of Christ. Encourage
your family, friends and relatives to work to stop Communion in the hand.
Our Lady of the Roses' awesome Bayside Prophecies...
https://www.tldm.org/Bayside/
These prophecies came from Jesus, Mary, and the saints to Veronica
Lueken at Bayside, NY, from 1968 to 1995.
REAL PRESENCE
"You violate your sacred trust. You have taken the Body of your Creator, the
Son of your God in the Trinity, and violated Him. You must do your eating at
home! When you come to the great Sacrifice, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass,
you come in reverence. You must go down upon your knees and do penance now
for the offenses to your God! ...
"As in the past, cannot you recognize the mystery of Heaven and earth?
Did not the staff of Moses turn into a serpent in the will of God? Did not
the river in Egypt turn into blood in the will of God? And cannot God, in
His will, come to you changing the bread and wine into the actual Presence,
the real Presence, the factual Presence of His Body and Blood?" - St.
Michael, February 1, 1977
GOODNESS AND
LOVE
"You must not take the Body of My Son in your hand! You open the door for
the entrance of evil spirits to defile My Son's Body! The consecrated
fingers of a duly ordained man of God, the priest, shall place My Son into
your mouth, and you must absorb His Body with goodness and love." - Our
Lady, March 22, 1975
SACRILEGE
"My Son is not pleased with the manner in which His Body and Blood is being
given to all of the humans upon earth.
"Communion in the hand has not been, and will not be accepted by Heaven.
This is a sacrilege in the eyes of the Eternal Father, and must not be
continued, for you only add to your punishment when you continue on in the
ways that have been found to be unpleasing to the Eternal Father." - Our
Lady, June 30, 1984
MAN OF GOD
"A priest is a man of God, chosen solely from the world to be a
representative of the Son of God.... As a man of God, he brings to you the
Body and Blood of your Savior.
"I tell you, my brothers and sister, that none shall take in his or her
hands the purified Body of your Savior! Only the consecrated fingers and
hands of the representative of Christ the Lord shall give and bring this
gift to mankind! - St. Theresa, October 2, 1975
THE LAST
SUPPER
Veronica - I see a very large mural in the sky now. It's dark all about it.
And I know it's a plaque; it's like a plaque up here in the sky, and it
shows the twelve apostles during the Last Supper. I see great sadness in
their faces because of the violation of the Host now. - September 7, 1977
SINISTER PLAN
"I ask you, My children--you ask Me many times in your prayers, shall you
accept My Son's Body in your hands? I say no! And no again for reason!
"You cannot judge all those about you, My children, who have accepted
this diabolical practice under the guise of leadership. No, My children,
this was brought about to desecrate My Son, to take from Him the truth of
His divine nature. No one who hears My voice must accept My Son's Body and
Blood in the hands! The chalice shall turn, and you shall be bathed in His
Blood!
"It was, My children, a sinister plan from the depths of hell to remove
the knowledge of the divinity of My Son from among you." - Our Lady,
February 10, 1978
DELUDED
"Again and again I wander to and fro directing My children to remain close
to the Eucharist, the Bread of life. But do not become misguided: Do not
accept My Son's Body in your hands.
"Satan, Lucifer, came as an angel of light and set his agents among the
hierarchy of My Son's Church and deluded them. All manner of abominations
are being committed upon My Son's Body now." - Our Lady, July 15, 1978
BLASPHEMY
"Many are giving My Body in a manner that can only be called blasphemy. Many
are accepting My Body in the Eucharist in a manner that defames the
Divinity, and also promotes unholiness, paganism, and impurity of heart and
actions during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass." - Jesus, May 26, 1979
DESECRATION
"My child, you ask why I cry? I shed tears of great anguish. I watch anew
the desecration to My Son's Body being committed upon earth. None shall
place their hands upon His Body!
"My Son has given you in trust those He has chosen among mankind to
represent Him-your priests. None others shall carry My Son to mankind! You
shall not defile His Body by giving Him into the hands of women, or those
that have not been prepared by the Father as legally-ordained priests in the
houses of God-laziness, preoccupied with the world and the pleasures of the
flesh!" - Our Lady, November 1, 1974
I
am the Bread of Life video
For two thousand years the Roman
Catholic Church has taught that the Most Blessed Sacrament contains the
“Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”
In His Eucharistic Presence, Jesus lives among us as the One who
loves us and gave Himself up for us.
We have discovered a most
fantastic video titled: I
am the Bread of Life. This
video is an up close personal look at how the lives of people in San
Antonio, Texas, have been dramatically touched by their devotion to Jesus in
the Most Blessed Sacrament through Eucharistic Adoration.
Their compelling stories inspire viewers to a more intimate
relationship with Our Eucharistic Jesus.
It tells of the tremendous graces, blessings, and miracles occurring
in people’s lives. There are
adoration programs in over sixty-five churches in the San Antonio Diocese,
which is transforming the area. This is a profoundly moving testimony to the
power, love, graces, and mercy people like you and me are receiving from the
Real Presence of Jesus in the Most Blessed Sacrament.
It is a personal witness to what Eucharistic Adoration can do in your
life. This most extraordinary
video costs $20.00 plus $3.00 shipping and handling.
If you are not absolutely thrilled with this video your money will be
cheerfully refunded. Item #V85
Write: These Last Days, P.O. Box 40, Lowell, MI 49331-0040
Directives from Heaven...
https://www.tldm.org/directives/directives.htm
D2 - The Holy Eucharist  PDF
D3 - Communion in the Hand? PDF
D146 - Honor the Eucharist, Part 1 PDF
D147 - Honor the Eucharist, Part 2 PDF
D148 - Adoration PDF
Articles...
Communion in the hand should be
rejected
https://www.tldm.org/News6/von-Hildebrand.htm
Fr.
John Hardon speaks out against Communion in the hand
https://www.tldm.org/News7/Hardon.htm
What the holy ones say about receiving
Jesus
https://www.tldm.org/News6/holy-ones.htm
More reasons for rejection Communion in
the hand
https://www.tldm.org/News5/CinH2.htm
Sacrileges due to Communion in the hand
https://www.tldm.org/forms/sacrilege1.htm
The
consecrated hands of a priest
https://www.tldm.org/News7/ConsecratedHands.htm
Bishop
Laise speaks out against Communion in the hand
https://www.tldm.org/News6/Laise.htm
Modernist and Protestant revolutionaries were behind Communion in the hand
https://www.tldm.org/News7/CommunionInTheHand.htm
Communion in the Hand: Documents and History (Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise)
https://www.tldm.org/News4/BishopLaise.htm
Bishop
Bernard Stewart against Communion in the hand
https://www.tldm.org/News7/BishopStewart.htm
For every Communion in the hand you
see, there will see more terrorism, more wars, more natural disasters man made and God
sent, more plagues, more punishments.
Take the Most Holy Eucharist
from a priest only, on the tongue only.
DO NOT take Communion from a lay distributor or a married
deacon.
My gift to help spread Our Lady of the Roses' messages to the world.
Email or print out the page and spread
this information to as many clergy and people as possible.
| Home - Latest News |
Introduction |
Bayside Prophecies | Directives from
Heaven | Order Form |
Miracles & Cures |
Veronica Lueken |
Miraculous Photos |
Bible |
Radio Program |
Bayside Videos |
The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.
Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a
hyperlink to:
https://www.tldm.org
Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2018 All rights
reserved.
P.O. Box 40
616-698-6448
Lowell, MI 49331-0040
Revised: July 25, 2022
|
