These Last Days News - September 12, 2023 URGENT: Forward a link to this web page to your clergy,
family, friends and relatives.
How This Dissident Jesuit Theologian is the Key to Understanding Pope Francis...
"Many of Our clergy have become blinded through
their love of worldly pleasure and riches. Many have accepted a soul once high
as a priest. Teilhard is in hell! He burns forever for the contamination he
spread throughout the world! A man of God has his choice as a human instrument
to enter into the kingdom of satan. "Man will not defy the laws of God
without going unpunished. You are a perverse generation, and you call the hand
of punishment down fast upon you."-
Our Lady of the Roses, March 18, 1973
CLERGY MISLEADING CHILDREN OF GOD "Measure for measure, the Eternal
Father shall meter to you a just form of punishment. Many shall die in the great
flame of the Ball of Redemption. "There is no excuse accepted now by the
Eternal Father among the clergy, who now offend the Eternal Father by misleading
the children of God upon earth. The experimentation and changes must be stopped
and reversed! There is no other course. "Many upon your earth now have
chosen to worship the adversary, satan. "I have told you, counseled you
in the past, that sin is insanity. Your world and its people are involved--they
walk as on a treadmill, seeking power and money and material goods and pleasure.
And they go round and about, never stopping as the world plunges faster to the
abyss."- Our Lady, August 4, 1979
The above Messages from Our Lady were given to Veronica Lueken at Bayside, New York.
Read more
In his homily in
Mongolia on Sunday, September 3, Pope Francis decided to quote Father
Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955) at some length:
The Mass is itself a way of giving thanks: ‘Eucharistía.’ To
celebrate Mass in this land brought to my mind the prayer that the
Jesuit Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin offered to God exactly a
hundred years ago, in the desert of Ordos, not far from here. He prayed:
‘My God, I prostrate myself before your presence in the universe that
has now become living flame: beneath the lineaments of all that I shall
encounter this day, all that happens to me, all that I achieve, it is
you I desire, you I await.’
Father Teilhard de Chardin was engaged in geological research. He
fervently desired to celebrate Holy Mass, but lacked bread and wine. So
he composed his ‘Mass on the World,’ expressing his oblation in these
words: ‘Receive, O Lord, this all-embracing host, which your whole
creation, moved by your magnetism, offers you at the dawn of this new
day.’ A similar prayer had already taken shape in him when he served as
a stretcher-bearer on the front lines during the First World War. This
priest, often misunderstood, had intuited that ‘the Eucharist is always
in some way celebrated on the altar of the world’ and is ‘the living
centre of the universe, the overflowing core of love and of
inexhaustible life’ (Laudato Sì’, 236), even in times like our own,
marked by conflicts and wars.
Let us pray this day, then, in the words of Father Teilhard de
Chardin: ‘Radiant Word, blazing Power, you who mould the manifold so as
to breathe life into it, I pray you, lay on us those your hands –
powerful, considerate, omnipresent.’
A bit wild and wooly, but one might be able to read it all in an orthodox
way.
Yet Teilhard de Chardin, the Piltdown paleontologist and “Omega Point”
mystagogue, is not exactly an uncomplicated and uncontroversial figure. Phil
Lawler describes him
as “a French author whose odd mixture of eugenics and evolutionary theory
drew several cautions from the Vatican during the pontificates of Pius XII
and John XXIII. More recently his work has drawn interest from exponents of
New Age spirituality.”1
‘An oracle and icon’
I maintain that Jorge Bergoglio, S.J., to a degree not yet as widely
recognized as it should be, has long shown himself to be an admirable
disciple of his Jesuit forerunner, who exercised an enormous influence on
the young Jesuit Turks of the twentieth century.
In his book “The
Myth of an Anti-Science Church: Galileo, Darwin, Teilhard, Hawking,
Dawkins” (Angelico Press, 2019), geneticist Gerard M. Verschuuren devotes an
entire rather detailed chapter (pp. 77–121) to Teilhard as scientist and
theologizer. He observes:
His greatest stature was reached when he became almost an oracle and
icon to many of what a twentieth-century Jesuit should be. Teilhard had
become their role model. In spite of ecclesiastical admonitions
regarding Teilhard-the-Ideologue, his ideas kept spreading in the
Society of Jesus. Not only has his way of thinking infiltrated – or
infected, according to some – the thinking of Jesuits, but it would also
become a major element of thinking in other Catholic groups. Many
Jesuits and other theologians have adopted Teilhard’s evolutionary
approach. (118)
I will assume, for the purposes of this article, that the reader has a
basic sense of who
Teilhard was: a scientist who contributed to a number of interesting (if
not always above-board) scientific enterprises and a writer of ponderous
poetico-theologico-scientific tomes such as “The Phenomenon of Man” and “The
Divine Milieu”that were roundly
mocked by scientists and, on account of their palpable pantheism, landed
him in deep trouble with his then conservatively-headed Jesuit order, as
well as with the Holy Office of the Inquisition (today’s Dicastery for the
Doctrine of the Faith). Here, I am more interested in pointing out the
striking parallels that emerge between him and his confrere in the chair of
Peter.
Verschuuren assembles an impressive series of quotations from across
Teilhard’s whole career to show that he was, indeed, a card-carrying
Modernist who perfectly fit the definition given by St. Pius X. First, let
us consider how Modernism operates, according to Verschuuren (emphasis
added):
What Modernism basically does is to harness religious belief and
practice to the cultural modes and whims of civilization in any given
era by asserting that there is no permanent datum of faith, no
dogma, and no fixed belief in Catholicism. This means that, due
to new developments in society and science, the Church can deny in one
age what she had affirmed in a previous age as essential dogma. Modernism
is the preservation of the formulae of doctrine emptied of their
meaning, in order to adapt the Faith of the Church to the alleged
requirements of modern society.
Not surprisingly, in the eyes of the Church, Modernism and
Catholicism cannot possibly live in the same religious house. Catholicism
acknowledges that what was true in Church doctrine yesterday cannot be
false today, and what was immoral yesterday cannot be moral today. Modernists,
in contrast, seem to have lost faith in their Faith and its orthodoxy;
Charles Péguy called them people who no longer believe what they
believe. Therefore, Modernism has been condemned by the Church on
several occasions for trying to transform Catholicism from the
inside.2
How strikingly the emphasized sentences describe the party in command of
the Catholic Church today!
The very model of a Modern(ist) major general
For his part, Teilhard manifested both sides of the Modernist. On the one
hand, he wanted to “aggiornamentalize,” or update, Christian doctrine until,
ceasing to be what it had been historically, it essentially turned into
modern thought. His preferred medium for the transition was evolutionary
scientism.
He believed not only that the evolution of species had already been
adequately demonstrated, but also that evolution is the paradigm for
grasping the whole of reality, including its spiritual aspects. He argued
that matter evolves into spirit and that spirit will evolve into the cosmic
Christ. The general framework is a Hegelian progressivism in which, in spite
of momentary setbacks and conflicts, the whole universe, with mankind at its
crest, is gradually improving, rising, and achieving spiritualization.
As a result, Teilhard rejected the doctrine of the creation and fall of
Adam and Eve and – more pointedly for the Holy Office – the doctrine of
original sin, which he called “an absurdity.” For Teilhard, the first men
(there were many of them) were prehistoric primates of weak intelligence,
and the “fall” simply describes the alienation from God of insufficiently
spiritualized beings. Thus, there is no place whatsoever for the doctrine of
a sin attaching to human nature by way of natural generation from Adam – in
spite of the fact that this was taught as a de fide dogma by the
Council of Trent.
Teilhard’s views on polygenism and original sin were among those
condemned in Pius XII’s encyclical Humani Generis of 1950. Yet
Teilhard’s reaction, while apparently submissive in the public forum, was
fiercely contemptuous in private. He characterized Humani Generis in
the following words:
A good psychoanalyst would see in it the clear traces of a specific
religious perversion – the masochism and sadism of orthodoxy; the
pleasure of swallowing, and making others swallow, the truth under its
crudest and stupidest forms.3
On the other hand – and this is a crucial point for understanding the
general ecclesial crisis in which we find ourselves today – Teilhard, like
many Modernists before and after him, refused to leave the Catholic Church,
no matter how “badly” he felt he was treated by it. For him, the goal was to
ride out the waves as long as possible, to influence and infiltrate, to make
disciples, plant seeds, and publish (or, in his case, arrange for posthumous
publications, since for the final period of his life, he was under
strictures). He really believed he had the mission of changing the Church from
within.
Although he no longer professed the Catholic Faith – he once said to
Dietrich von Hildebrand that St. Augustine “had spoiled everything by
introducing the supernatural” (!) – the idea of being an ex-Catholic,
sitting on the outside of the institution, held no appeal for him. It was as
if he thought that only the Catholic Church provided the infrastructure
necessary for the transmission of a synthetic, worldwide philosophy.
Thus, in a letter dated January 26, 1936, he wrote:
What increasingly dominates my interest is the effort to establish
within myself, and to diffuse around me, a new religion (let’s call it
an improved Christianity if you like) whose personal God is no longer
the great Neolithic landowner of times gone by, but the Soul of the
world… as demanded by the cultural and religious stage we have now
reached.
In another letter about five years later, on March 21, 1941, he declared:
“According to my own principles, I cannot fight against Christianity; I can
only work inside it by trying to transform and convert it.” In response to a
defrocked priest whom he refers to as “Fr. G.,” Teilhard wrote on October 4,
1950:
Basically I consider – as you do – that the Church (like any living
reality after a certain time) reaches a period of ‘mutation’ or
‘necessary reformation’ after two thousand years; it is unavoidable.
Mankind is undergoing a mutation, how could Catholicism not do the same?
His evolutionist-pantheistic-animistic point of view prompted him to
admit: “I find I can’t but realize again (and even more profoundly) the size
of the abyss which separates my religious vision of the World and the vision
in the Exercises of Ignatius.” A Jesuit who can no longer embrace
the Spiritual Exercisesof St. Ignatius is not only not a Jesuit in
reality; he is not even a Catholic. We are, accordingly, hardly surprised to
read these words from 1934: “If by consequence of some internal upheaval, I
came to lose successively my faith in Christ, my faith in a personal God, my
faith in the Spirit, it seems to me that I should continue to believe in the
World.”
Along these lines, consider the ominous admissions contained in a letter
Teilhard wrote to Léontine Zanta, which was published in 1965 in Lettres
à Léontine Zanta:
It is not a question of superimposing Christ upon the world, but of
‘panchristizing’ the Universe. The delicate point (I have partly touched
on it in Christologie et Evolution) is that, in pursuing this line of
thought, one is led not merely to an enlargement of views, but to a
reversal of perspectives: evil (no longer punishment for a fault, but
‘sign and effect’ of Progress) and Matter (no longer a guilty and
inferior element, but ‘the stuff of Spirit’) take on a meaning
diametrically opposed to the meaning habitually considered as Christian.
Christ emerges from the transformation incredibly exalted (at least I
think so – and all the worried ones to whom I have spoken of it share my
view). But is this still really the Christ of the Gospel? And if it is
not He, on what, henceforth, is based what we seek to build?… One thing
reassures me: it is that the growing light within me is accompanied by
love and by self-renunciation in the Greater than me. This could not
possibly mislead.4
(On this particular passage, Jacques Maritain dryly remarked: “Would that
such proofs, alas, as noble as they are, could never mislead.”5)
In another work, Teilhard expresses the Hegelian view that “God
consummates himself only by uniting himself” (with the Other).
What infuses Christianity with life is not a sense of the contingence
of the created, but rather a sense of the mutual Completion of the World
and of God… God is inevitably induced to immerse himself in the
Multitude, in order to “incorporate it” into himself.6
Teilhard was a lifelong believer in Marxism. With typical flair, he
announced in a letter of August 14, 1952:
The Christian God on high and the Marxist God of Progress are
reconciled in Christ… As I love to say, the synthesis of the Christian
God (of the above) and the Marxist God (of the forward) – Behold! that
is the only God whom henceforth we can adore in spirit and in truth.
No wonder, as Verschuuren notes, “Teilhard is the only Roman Catholic
author whose works were put on public display with those of Marx and Lenin
in Moscow’s Hall of Atheism.”
In a homage to Teilhard that should send chills down our spines for its
modern applicability, his disciple Henri Rambaud proclaimed:
[Teilhard] was perfectly sincere in calling himself a Christian and
even a Roman Catholic since, in his own eyes, the only disagreement
between himself and the Church arose from the fact that he was already
thinking then what the Church did not yet know she would be thinking
shortly… Instead of being in agreement with the Church of today, he is
in agreement with the Church of tomorrow.
From most of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s writings, the breathtaking
candor he exhibited in his private correspondence was notably absent. In its
place was a hazy, poetic, shimmering rhetoric of grandiose pseudo-scientific
speculations and quasi-mystical theologizing, replete with a jargon all his
own: “Christogenesis,” “cosmogenesis,” “anthropogenesis,”
“ultrahominization,” “geosphere,” “biosphere,” “noosphere,” “Omega point,”
etc. He dazzled and seduced the “daring” wing of his own order and those
who, around the time of the Second Vatican Council, were looking for a new
theology to accompany a new era of man.
Master of ambiguity
Here is where I particularly sat up in my chair while reading
Verschuuren:
Manipulating terminology and vocabulary is often a very clever
way of disguising one’s underlying ideology. That happened many
times in history. That’s how some have changed the concept of human
rights into something like ‘reproductive rights.’ That’s how some have
simply redefined the word ‘conception’ as no longer being the time of
union of sperm cell and egg cell, but rather the time, one week later,
when this new human becomes implanted inside the lining of the mother’s
womb. And others have – sometimes openly, sometimes slyly – redefined
the ‘gender’ concept to refer to the sex a person identifies with,
instead of the sex a person was born with. However, redefining terms
does not change reality.7
More specifically:
Teilhard knew how to manipulate language so you don’t quite know
what he actually says or intends to say. That probably explains why
he can be accepted and praised by Christians and non-Christians alike,
by believers and non-believers, by orthodox and heterodox Christians.
But that’s also the reason why one cannot just completely defend him or
[completely] attack him… Again, his secret was ambiguity, with which he
could mislead the ones “for” him as well as those “against” him…
In much of his writing, Teilhard is vague and ambiguous enough to
dodge critics on either side… Teilhard knew how to dress his ideas
up sufficiently for them to have some chance of not being suppressed at
first sight.8
This is the strategy Pope Francis has adopted again and again. In Amoris
Laetitia, he made sure that the permission to give the sacraments to
unrepentant adulterers was framed in vague, stretchy, and endlessly
debatable language that has pitted liberals against conservatives,
conservatives against traditionalists, and everyone against everyone.
In the Catechism change on the death penalty, he chose the
weasel word “inadmissible” rather than the stronger “contrary to the Gospel”
he had used in his speech of October 11, 2017 – and yet the modified text
still footnotes this very speech. In all three synods – the two on the
family and the most recent on youth – he put into place a bureaucracy of
sycophants who worked tirelessly to ensure that the final documents would be
larded with half-truths, jargony sociologese, a lack of distinctions, and
other such devices of indirection and insinuation.9
The reason for this strategy is simple. Truth sheds light and seeks
further light, but deception and error hide in shadowy, slippery places.
Just as pro-abortionists are generally unwilling to come right out and say
that everyone should be free to poison or dismember their own children, and
just as Planned Parenthood is unwilling to come right out and say that a
major foundational and operative goal of its organization is the reduction
of what Margaret Sanger held to be genetically unfit inferior races such as
the negroes, so too most progressive priests and bishops are still unwilling
to dissent openly from the Catholic Faith, so they must find
roundabout ways to express their views – and, ultimately, to enforce them on
the unreconstructedfundamentalists.
Verschuuren calls Teilhard de Chardin a “master of ambiguity,” noting
that “ambiguity can help immunize against any attack” (96). So it has proved
with the Jesuit Bergoglio: apart from some obvious cases of plain talk, he
prefers to tack to and fro, giving with one hand and taking with the other,
now saying something orthodox, now something fishy, but always pushing
pragmatically, through his personnel appointments and strategic decisions,
toward the modernist goals he has set himself.
In its own way, it is quite masterful, manifesting an art that has been
brought to perfection. Although much of what has been said about Jesuits
over the centuries can be written off as black legends, there are reasons
why “jesuitical” has become a synonym for crafty, clever, consequentialist,
equivocating. In addition to Teilhard de Chardin, such modern Jesuits as
George Tyrrell, Karl
Rahner, Joseph Jungmann, John Courtney Murray, Josef Fuchs, Carlo Maria
Martini, Anthony de Mello, and in our own day James Martin and Arturo Sosa
Abascal, display the same art again and again: the finding of a way to say
erroneous things without seeming to say them, of compromising the
Catholic Faith while seeming to remain within the bounds of
orthodoxy.10
St. Thomas Aquinas, lauded dozens of times by the Church’s Magisterium as
the exemplar of the harmony between faith and reason, did exactly the
opposite. As Verschuuren himself points out, Aquinas is “the master of
philosophical distinctions and terminological clarity” (136). The Angelic
Doctor carefully avoided ambiguity and equivocation, finding the best and
most lucid phrasings for the most difficult doctrines, always with immense
humility before the mystery of Divine Revelation and the authoritative
documents of the Church.11
In fact, although Aquinas had a remarkable poetic gift (as indicated in
his hymns for the Office of Corpus Christi, which are recognized as towering
summits of medieval verse), he deliberately chose a plain and lucid style in
his prose so that rhetorical tropes, poetic imagery, and emotional
vibrations would not clutter, confuse, or obscure the handing on of sacred
doctrine. In short, he avoided the kind of language that dominates
Teilhard’s effusions.
Portrayal of a “sainted” Teilhard, by Lewis Williams, OFS. You can get
this image on tote bags, iPhone cases, pillows, cards, mugs, purses,
etc. The perfect accompaniment for your next papal audience!
Disobedience personified?
Verschuuren’s final estimation of Teilhard once again has chilling
relevance to our own situation:
Some have called him ‘an obedient but stubborn son of the church’ – a
Church he refused to leave, for he considered her a great vehicle for
his thoughts. It is probably equally accurate to describe him as an
obstinate rebel under the outward guise of submissiveness. Rome tells
him again and again that he is mistaken, but he does not change one
single feature of his mental universe. He never renounced pursuing, with
all his strength, a goal that Rome had condemned.
Only now the situation is far worse. Teilhard was a maverick Jesuit with
his own agenda who kept coming into conflict with a Rome committed to
doctrinal orthodoxy. Today a maverick Jesuit with his own revolutionary
agenda sits on the very throne of Peter, his own novelties condemned by the
teaching of his predecessors, so that the very categories of obedience and
stubbornness, rebellion and submissiveness, are hopelessly muddled. However
problematic and unsatisfactory it may be to contrast “eternal Rome” with
“modernist Rome,” there is no denying that our dramatic situation has given
this narrative – which already possesses uncomfortable plausibility for the
entire postconciliar period – a resounding truthfulness.
We may sincerely hope for the day when a restored Holy Office will issue
a monitum about many of the documents that have appeared in
Francis’s pontificate, a monitum comparable to the one issued by
the same Holy Office on June 30, 1962, in regard to the writings of Teilhard
de Chardin:
It is sufficiently clear that the above-mentioned works abound in
such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic
doctrine.
Ironically, the Anglican C. S. Lewis showed a much more “Catholic”
sensibility than current Church leadership when, in 1960, he wrote to a
Jesuit friend: “How right your Society was to shut up de Chardin!”12
Reprinted by permission of Dr. Peter Kwasniewski from his Substack “Tradition
and Sanity.”
I hasten to add that the charism of St. Ignatius of Loyola, when
faithfully lived out, has always produced great saints in every age,
such as (to skip over many others who could be mentioned) William
Doyleand Fr.
John Hardon. Moreover, in fairness, we have to admit that the other
great religious orders such as the Franciscans, Dominicans,
Redemptorists, Cistercians, and Benedictines were also burdened with
heretics and perverts in the twentieth century. Without the Benedictines
of St. John’s in Collegeville, for example, we would not be suffering
under the scourge of the Novus Ordo. Really, it was the worst of
centuries all around.
It may be noted in passing that the citations from St. Thomas
Aquinas in the notes of Amoris Laetitia are taken out of
context and misleading. There are two theories being entertained about
this fact: one is that certain drafters were clever enough to try to
undermine the errors of Francis by citing Aquinas’s true doctrine; the
other is that the drafters were incompetently attempting to shore up the
text by window-dressing it with ineptly chosen passages from St. Thomas,
passages they themselves did not well understand. For a full account,
see Peter Dvořák, “Is Amoris Laetitia Thomistic?,” in Lukáš
Novák and Marie Tejklová, eds., Dispelling
the Fog: Critical Essays on Amoris Laetitia, 29-50.
Letter to Fr. Frederick Joseph Adelmann, September 21, 1960.
EDITOR'S NOTE: We welcome your comments at the end of
this page. Email a link or print out a copy of this web page to your
clergy, family, friends and relatives. Email this page to a
friend.
"O
pastors in My Son's House, how many times must I warn you of the dangers of your
innovations, the dangers of your experimenting in My Son's House? You will not
convert, you will not return Our straying sheep with your improvisions. You must
return discipline to My Son's House. This discipline must start with the rulers
in My Son's House."
-
Our Lady, November 22, 1976
We strongly encourage you to print and/or email copies of this web page to
all the bishops and clergy. Also, email or mail a copy of this web page to
the news media and as many other people as possible.
Email a copy of this page to everyone you know.
We
urgently need your prayers and financial support to be able to continue to
create these web pages.
Click here...
Thank you in advance.
Wars
are a punishment for man's sins. Abortion, homosexuality, and the changes
in the Catholic Church cry out to Heaven for just punishment. When you
pray the Holy Rosary, you have Our Lady's hand in your hand. When you pray
the Holy Rosary, you have the power of God in your hands. Start now! Let's All Pray the Rosary Together Around the World for people to understand the error in de Chardin's works...Click
here...
Our Lady of
the Roses Awesome Bayside Prophecies...https://www.tldm.org/Bayside/ These prophecies came from Jesus, Mary, and the saints to Veronica
Lueken at Bayside, NY, from 1968 to 1995.
DISCORD AND DISUNITY "The great Council, the Council that has brought forth discord,
disunity, and the loss of souls, the major fact behind this destruction was
because of the lack of prayer.
Satan sat in within this Council, and he watched his advantage. He is now
playing a game of chess with the Red Hats and the Purple Hats, moving them
with great glee as he watches the evil accelerate, and all manners of people
are flowing fast through the doors of the Holy City and all ecumenical
bodies." - St. Michael, March 18, 1976
"AWAKEN FROM YOUR BLINDNESS" "Many, My child, are feasting in
My houses, sowing seeds of discord and impurity! Cleanse your House now, My
clergy, for My hand shall descend upon you! "The
knowledge of the supernatural must not be taken from the hearts of My
children. My shepherds, awaken from your blindness; you are misleading Our
sheep! "How long shall the Eternal Father persevere in
hoping that you shall turn from your present ways that are leading souls
onto the road to perdition? Hasten, harken, and listen, for the warning
given to you now is one of the final warnings being given to mankind.
"All who have given themselves to the pleasures of the flesh, all who have
given themselves to the new modes of humanism and modernism set down for
ensnarement of the human race by satan, all those who close their ears to
Our voices, shall burn!" - Jesus, May 28, 1975
"ERRORS ABOUND IN MY HOUSE!" "I admonish My pastors, those who
have gathered My flock, My sheep, to take a good look at yourselves.
Contemplate in prayer; retire from your world which has been given to satan.
You must make your decision now, if you will fulfill your role upon earth as
pastors, as leaders of My flock. If not, you will be taken from among them.
Your soul in darkness shall continue fast into the abyss.
"Many who have been given the highest honors in My Church have used their
positions of leadership to destroy the knowledge of the light from Heaven,
to destroy souls by misleading. Errors abound in My House, errors built with
motives of self-gain and glory. What will it get you? What do you gain when
you destroy your soul? "I do not have to repeat anew
the warnings given to you in the past. You will act upon these warnings and
restore My House! I have given you a firm foundation of Faith. What are you
building now? Churches of man?" - Jesus, December 6, 1975
CLERGY MUST RETURN TO PRAYER "My Mother has come to you as a
Mediatrix. Her voice has gone throughout your world. Many have rejected Her
words, and those who accept them will be saved. Many will die in the great
flame of the Ball of Redemption. You will keep a constant vigilance of
prayer. "We have asked Our clergy to return to their
lives of prayer. They will gain nothing by joining the world, nothing but
the destruction of souls and misleading Our sheep. Awaken from your slumber,
shepherds! Do not cast aside, in your pride, the warning from Heaven. You,
too, will stand in judgment!" - Jesus, March 29, 1975
"MANY OF YOU ARE MISLED" "I spoke, My child, of the elect. We
refer to the elect as Our dedicated clergy, men of God chosen from the sheep
to be the shepherds. Satan has sent a great delusion upon your world. Satan
roams in the House of God. O leaders of Our sheep, shepherds of Our flock,
will you stand before the Father and say that your teaching has been pure in
His sight? No! Many of you are misleading. Many of you are misled and carry
your error into the souls of others. Awaken! Strip the blindness from your
eyes and hearts! Do not destroy souls for the acknowledgement of man! You
will not set up man as an idol to worship. "Discipline
will be needed. A firm foundation has no need to be reinforced with new
ideas. "All manner of confusion is being sowed upon
your earth by satan. You are like sheep running in every direction. And you
will become prey for the wolves in sheep's clothing. You have been given
your cross. Wear your sacramentals, be with My Son at the tabernacles of the
world, and accept the graces that the Father bestows upon you, and you will
not lose the way." - Our Lady, July 25, 1974
MANIPULATED "There is, My children, a
great conspiracy of evil now throughout your world—the
forces, the columns of evil. Man has given them many names-the fifth column.
They have been broken up into political parties, including communism. O My
children, they are but small arms of the octopus, the gigantic conspiracy of
evil that will unite your world and My Son's Church under the rule of despots! "There
is in Rome, My children, a great struggle for power, a political machine
controlled by satan. There shall be a war of the spirits. It shall be bishop
against bishop and cardinal against cardinal. "I
repeat, My children, as I have told you in the past, that the great Council of
Vatican II was manipulated by satan. He sat there among you and he worked you
like a chessboard. "What
can you do now to recover? It is simple, My children: turn back and start over
with the foundation given to you. You must bring respect back to your
priesthood. You must bring respect back to your Holy Father, Pope Paul VI. I
have warned you of all the manners of abominations, errors, and delusions that
have been set upon you. Listen, and act upon My warnings to you!" -
Our Lady, May 15, 1976
STARTED "Yes, My child, even with
Vatican II, it started out with the best resolves, but then satan took over the
scene. And with his agents he reached into the highest professions, the highest
league of the hierarchy, until it saddens Me to say that many priests now are on
the road to perdition and taking many others with them." -
Jesus, July 25, 1985
EDITOR'S COMMENT: Evil is accelerating and the
Anti-Christ forces are gaining power in the world. When the persecution starts,
all Christian web sites on the internet will be forced to close. Be sure to
have in your possession all the following items: the
Bayside Prophecy books,
Bayside Medals,
Douay-Rheims Bibles, the
Protection Packets,Candles,Sacramentals, and
Religious Books. Purchase these items now
while they are still available! You will urgently need them in the days ahead.
Also, you can print out all PDF files for the
Directives from Heaven and all of the
Bayside
Prophecies. Copy Our Lady's messages and the Directives from Heaven
now while they are still available! Pray to the Holy Spirit for wisdom and
guidance on how to prepare now and for the days ahead when the Antichrist is
revealed. Viva Cristo Rey!
There are 4 Things You Must Have to Survive
the End Times:
1.) The Douay-Rheims Holy Bible...
"I ask that all who hear My voice will take their
Bibles, and if they do not have one, search, but find the right Bible, those
printed not after 1965, My children." - Jesus, October 5, 1985
"You must all obtain a copy of the Book of life and love, the Bible. Do not
accept the new mods. Try to find in your bookstores the old Bibles, My
children, for many are being changed to suit the carnal nature of man.
I repeat, sin has become a way of life." - Our Lady, October 6, 1992
"I must ask you all to read but a few short chapters
a day now, the Book of life and love, your Bible. Knowledge must be gained
for all the disciples of My Son, for you will be attacked by scientific
minds. But do not be concerned what you will say to them when accosted, for
the words will be given to you by the Spirit." - Our Lady, April 10, 1976
The Douay-Rheims Bible was published in 1899.
It is the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church. Almost all
other Bibles have been rewritten by Satan. See:
https://www.tldm.org/directives/d33.htm
, https://www.tldm.org/directives/d415.htm
and https://www.tldm.org/directives/d182.htm
If you don't have a Douay-Rheims Bible order it now!
(Order Form) Yours and your loved ones salvation could depend on
it. Read the Bible cover to cover. If you
read 4 chapters a day, you will complete the whole Bible in 334 days.
I have read the Bible 2 times and working on the third time. A 75 year
old Baptism gentleman told me that he and his wife have read the Bible nine
times. Wow!
2.) The Complete Virgin Mary’s Bayside Prophesies in 6 Paperback Books...
The
Virgin Mary brings directions from God, the Father in Heaven on how to
survive the end times. God, the Father, through the Virgin Mary, tells
what is coming, how to prepare for it, how to survive it, and how to even
stop it. These six volumes along with the Bible are most important to
save yourself and your loved ones. Order it now. Tomorrow may be
to late. These 6 pocket size paperback books costs $33.00.
(Order Form)
3.) Heaven's Home Protection Packet...
Heaven’s Home Protection Packet... Our Lord stated we must have
crucifixes upon the outside of all of our outside doors. In the "Heaven’s
Home Protection Packet" there are instructions, four crucifixes,
a tube of special cement for
wooden or metal crucifixes. Wooden crucifixes adhere better to the doors
when the aluminum strap is removed from the back. Put a light coat of cement
on the back of the crucifix and then press it to the outside of the door. If
you have any problems, you can call us at 616-698-6448 for assistance. This
Heaven’s Home Protection Packet is available for a donation of $10.00 plus
$4.00 shipping and handling. Send $14.00 to TLD Ministries, P.O. Box 40,
Lowell, MI 49331. Item # P15 (Order Form)
Crucifix on front and back door... The only real protection
against terrorists... Jesus - "Pray and wear your sacramentals. And,
also, My children, I ask you again to place a crucifix upon your door. Both
front and back doors must have a crucifix. I say this to you because there
will be carnage within your areas, and this will pass you by if you keep
your crucifix upon your doors." (6-30-84)
(Testimonies
of lives and homes saved by the crucifixes.) https://www.tldm.org/news/crucifix.htm(Order
Form)
4.) Heaven's Personal Protection Packet...
Heaven’s Personal Protection Packet . . . Our Lady tells us to be protected from all evil, we must
wear the following sacramentals around our necks: a Rosary, a crucifix, the
St. Benedict medal, Our Lady of the Roses medal, the Miraculous Medal, and
the scapular. We have all of these sacramentals in a packet we call
"Heaven's Personal Protection Packet." This packet is available for a
donation of $7.00 plus $3.00 shipping and handling. Send $10.00 to TLD
Ministries, P.O. Box 40, Lowell, MI 49331. Item # P5 (Order Form)
Our Lady of the Roses, Mary Help of
Mothers promises to help protect our children. On September 13, 1977, She
said, "He has an army of ogres wandering now throughout your country and all
of the countries of the world. They are in possession of great power; so
wear your sacramentals, and protect your children and your households. Learn
the use every day of holy water throughout your household. Insist even with
obstructions, insist that your children always wear a sacramental. One day
they will understand that they will repel the demons."
On February 1, 1974, Our Lady said, "My children, know the value of these
sacramentals. Guard your children well. You must awaken to the knowledge
that you will not be protected without the sacramentals. Guard your
children's souls. They must be surrounded with an aura of purity. Remove
them if necessary from the sources of contamination, be it your schools or
even false pastors." This Heaven’s Personal Protection
Packet is available for a donation of $7.00 plus $3.00 shipping and
handling. Send $10.00 to TLD Ministries, P.O. Box 40, Lowell, MI 49331. You
may use your MasterCard, VISA, or American Express and call 1-616-698-6448.
Item # P5 (Order Form)
Incredible Bayside Prophecies on the United States and
Canada book . . .
We have researched the Bayside Prophecies on the
United States and Canada and put these outstanding prophecies in a 360 page
pocket size paperback book. Veronica said it was very good. It tells what is
going to happen here and how to prepare for it. Every North American must read
this book! Item #B2 Cost $5.00 (Order Form)
Your names have been written in Heaven... "It is not by accident that
you are called by My Mother, for your names have been written in Heaven.... But
with this great grace you have great responsibility to send this Message from
Heaven throughout the world, for if you are able to recover just one more for
Heaven, an additional star shall be placed in your crown." - Jesus, August 5,
1975
A great obligation to go forward... "It is not by accident that you
are called by My Mother, for it is by merit and the prayers that have risen to
Heaven for your salvation. For those who have received the grace to hear the
Message from Heaven, you have a great obligation to go forward and bring this
Message to your brothers and sisters. Do not expect a rest upon your earth, for
you will have eternal rest very soon." - Jesus, June 12, 1976
The sin of omission... "The sin of omission
shall condemn many to hell, be they layman or Hierarchy. I repeat: not the sin
of commission, but the sin of omission will commit many to hell." Our Lady
of the Roses, October 6, 1980
My gift to help spread Our Lady of the Roses' messages to the world.
We
encourage everyone to print or email copies of this web page to all the Bishops
and all the clergy. Also, email or send this web page to the news media
and as many people as possible.